Home Blog Page 7

What are the Trends in Health Utilization and Spending in Early 2024?


Current trends in healthcare usage and expenditure indicate that health service spending has surpassed pre-pandemic levels, with costs escalating at a pace quicker than in recent years. Nevertheless, the use of healthcare services varies significantly by setting and market. For instance, certain indicators of hospital utilization are still below pre-pandemic figures, potentially signaling a shift towards outpatient care.

This collection of charts explores the latest trends in healthcare utilization and expenditure using multiple data sources. By the first quarter of 2024, the annual increase in health services spending has outstripped levels seen prior to the pandemic.

The complete chart collection and additional information on health costs can be accessed at the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, a comprehensive online resource focused on evaluating and monitoring the efficacy of the U.S. health system.



Source link

The First-Ever Government Negotiation Process for Drugs Has Finished, But the Politics Are Ongoing


Written by KFF’s Tricia Neuman, Juliette Cubanski, and Larry Levitt, this article in Health Affairs Forefront explores the implications of the inaugural Medicare drug price negotiations, detailing the savings they will provide for both the government and Medicare recipients. Additionally, the piece considers how candidates’ perspectives on this topic may influence the upcoming elections and the future of drug price negotiations by the government.



Source link

While Medicare Drug Price Negotiations Don’t Apply to Private Insurance, 3.4 Million People with Employer Coverage Take at Least One of the Selected Drugs


In 2022, out of the 167 million individuals with employer-sponsored insurance, 3.4 million utilized at least one of the top 10 drugs designated for Medicare price negotiations, as reported by a new KFF analysis. Medicare anticipates releasing the negotiated drug prices, which are set to take effect in 2026, no later than September 1, 2024.

The most frequently prescribed drug for those with employer-sponsored health insurance was Jardiance, a medication used for managing diabetes and heart failure, with over 911,000 enrollees using it.

Looking ahead, the Medicare program will negotiate prices for additional medications, potentially affecting millions more individuals with employer coverage. Currently, the impact of reduced drug prices in Medicare on private insurance plans is not direct, and the indirect effects remain uncertain. Some experts contend that lower negotiated prices in Medicare could lead to increased prices in private insurance, whereas others argue that these Medicare prices may establish a benchmark, facilitating savings.

The complete analysis and further information regarding health costs can be found on the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, a dedicated online resource for monitoring and evaluating the U.S. health system’s performance.



Source link

How Many People with Employer-Sponsored Insurance Use the Drugs Slated for Medicare Price Negotiations


In 2022, out of the 167 million individuals with employer-sponsored insurance, 3.4 million utilized at least one of the first 10 medications earmarked for Medicare price negotiations, according to a recent analysis. The drug most commonly used by those with employer-sponsored health insurance was Jardiance, which is prescribed for diabetes and heart failure, with over 911,000 enrollees using it.

This analysis leverages the Merative MarketScan 2022 commercial claims data to estimate the number of enrollees in the employer-sponsored insurance sector who use one or more of the ten drugs chosen for Medicare Part D price negotiations.

The complete analysis and additional information regarding health costs can be found on the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, a comprehensive online resource aimed at monitoring and evaluating the performance of the U.S. healthcare system.



Source link

Compare Trump and Harris Health Care Records and Positions


Sure! Here’s the rewritten content while maintaining the HTML tags:

<div style="flex-basis:800px">

<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="2280" height="800" src="https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?w=1024" alt="An image showing Kamala Harris on a blue background and Donald Trump on a red background" class="wp-image-630052 no-lazy-loaded" srcset="https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png 2280w, https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?resize=300,105 300w, https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?resize=768,269 768w, https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?resize=1024,359 1024w, https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?resize=1536,539 1536w, https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?resize=2048,719 2048w, https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?resize=758,266 758w, https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?resize=760,267 760w, https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?resize=735,258 735w, https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?resize=698,245 698w, https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?resize=200,70 200w, https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?resize=215,75 215w, https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/240724_Presidential-Election_Comparison_Hero.png?resize=800,281 800w" sizes="(max-width: 2280px) 100vw, 2280px"/></figure></div>

<p class="has-text-align-center" style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-bottom:18px;font-size:16px">The content was last updated on September 24, 2024</p>

<p class="has-text-align-center">The general election campaign is in progress, featuring former President Trump as the Republican nominee and Vice President Harris as the Democratic nominee, both vying for the presidency. While health care reform might not be the focal point of this election as it has been in previous years, it continues to be a crucial issue for many voters. Trump and Harris possess contrasting records and perspectives on health care. This comparative analysis serves as a timely resource to grasp Trump’s presidential achievements alongside Harris’ record in both the Biden-Harris administration and her prior public service, along with their present views and proposed policies. The proposals refer to the candidates' time in their respective positions as president and vice president unless specified otherwise through text or links. This resource will be regularly updated as new information and policy specifics become available during the campaign.</p>

</div>



Source link

Marketplace Insurers are Proposing a 7% Average Premium Hike for 2025 and Pointing to Rising Hospital Prices and GLP-1 Drugs as Key Drivers of Costs


According to a recent KFF analysis of preliminary rate filings, ACA Marketplace insurers are suggesting a median premium hike of 7% for 2025. This is quite similar to the 6% increase that was proposed for 2024. The proposed rate adjustments from insurers, which predominantly range from 2% to 10%, are subject to change during the review phase.

While the majority of Marketplace participants benefit from subsidies and are unlikely to bear these increased costs directly, rising premiums typically lead to augmented federal expenditures on subsidies. Additionally, the reasons put forth by insurers for these premium adjustments provide insights into the broader factors influencing health spending.

KFF’s analysis of publicly available documents reveals that insurers attribute the escalation in premiums for 2025 to rising healthcare costs, specifically for hospital services, alongside an uptick in the utilization of weight loss and other specialty medications.

This year, the surge in costs that insurers encounter for medical services appears to have a more significant impact on premiums than the increase in care usage. Insurers highlight that workforce shortages and the consolidation of hospital markets, which exert upward pressure on healthcare costs and prices, are contributing to the rise in health insurance premiums for 2025.

Simultaneously, the escalating demand for GLP-1 medications like Ozempic and Wegovy, which are prescribed for diabetes and obesity, is driving up spending on prescription drugs.

The complete analysis and additional information regarding health costs can be accessed at the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, an online platform committed to tracking and evaluating the performance of the U.S. healthcare system.



Source link

How Much and Why ACA Marketplace Premiums Are Going Up in 2025


This revised report on insurers’ initial rate filings indicates that ACA Marketplace insurers are proposing a median premium hike of 7% for 2025, which is comparable to the 6% increase filed for 2024. Insurers attribute the premium surge for 2025 primarily to escalating healthcare costs — especially in hospital care — along with a rise in the use of weight loss and other specialized medications, as highlighted by KFF’s review of publicly available documents.

The proposed rate adjustments by insurers, most of which range from 2% to 10%, may be subject to changes during the evaluation process. While the vast majority of Marketplace participants are subsidized and are not anticipated to bear these added expenses, increases in premiums typically lead to higher federal expenditures on subsidies.

This analysis is accessible on the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, a resource dedicated to monitoring and evaluating the performance of the U.S. healthcare system.



Source link

What Drives Health Spending in the U.S. Compared to Other Countries


A newly updated issue brief examines the factors influencing health expenditures in the U.S. and highlights key distinctions between the U.S. and other affluent, large nations. The study reveals that individuals in the U.S. spent an additional $5,683 per person on healthcare compared to their counterparts in similarly sized and wealthier countries. Nearly 80% of this spending disparity can be attributed to costs associated with inpatient and outpatient care. Additionally, many retail prescription medications are priced higher in the U.S. In 2021, the U.S. allocated $1,635 per capita on prescription drugs, including over-the-counter medications, while comparable countries averaged $944.

The full analysis is accessible through the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, a comprehensive online resource aimed at monitoring and evaluating the U.S. health system’s performance.



Source link

What are the Consequences of Health Care Debt Among Older Adults?


In the United States, health care debt has become a widespread concern, catching the attention of lawmakers and emerging as a possible campaign topic. A 2022 KFF survey revealed that 2 out of 5 US adults (41%) across all age groups reported incurring some form of debt due to medical or dental expenses for themselves or others. Almost 75% of adults express concern over managing unexpected medical bills or healthcare costs, which is higher than those worried about other household expenses. The Medicare program provides health insurance to 66 million individuals, primarily older adults aged 65 and above, assisting with medical care costs for eligible individuals. However, many older adults still face health care cost issues, resulting in significant debt exposure with potentially serious and lasting repercussions for both health and finances.

Medicare covers a broad spectrum of health care services, including hospital stays, doctor visits, prescription medications, and post-acute care. However, beneficiaries typically face out-of-pocket expenses for premiums, deductibles, cost-sharing for Medicare-covered services, and expenses for non-covered services such as dental, vision, and hearing care and long-term services and supports. Households with Medicare beneficiaries generally spend more on health care compared to other households and allocate a higher percentage of their budgets to medical expenses. This is especially challenging for the millions of Medicare beneficiaries who have limited income and savings to cover unexpected health-related expenses. Additionally, older adults are more prone to cognitive impairments like Alzheimer’s Disease, which have been linked to declines in credit scores and financial instability years before diagnosis.

This data note explores findings from the KFF Health Care Debt Survey to evaluate the prevalence, sources, and repercussions of health care debt among adults aged 65 and older.

Key Takeaways

  • In 2022, over one in five US adults aged 65 and above (22%) reported some form of debt due to medical or dental expenses, a figure that is half of what was reported among adults aged 50-64 (44%).
  • Among Medicare-age adults facing health care debt, significant portions stated that some of the bills leading to their debt stemmed from routine health care services, including lab fees and diagnostic tests (49%), dental services (48%), and doctor visits (41%).
  • Nearly 30% of Medicare-age adults with health care debt (29%) reported that their household had been contacted by a collection agency over medical or dental invoices in the last five years, while one-quarter (23%) noted that health care debt adversely impacted their credit score.
  • Sixty-two percent of Medicare-age adults with health care debt indicated that they, or someone in their household, delayed, skipped, or sought alternatives to necessary health care or prescription medications due to costs in the past year.

In 2022, 22% of US adults aged 65 and older reported incurring health care debt due to medical or dental bills (Figure 1). This percentage is about half of that seen in adults aged 50 to 64 (44%), who have yet to qualify for Medicare based on age. The lower incidence of health care debt among older adults is likely attributed, in part, to nearly universal Medicare coverage for individuals aged 65 and over. Additionally, most Medicare beneficiaries possess some form of coverage that mitigates their cost-sharing exposure, like Medicare Advantage or supplemental coverage such as Medicaid, retiree health benefits, or Medigap.

The prevalence of health care debt among those aged 65 and older surpasses what has been reported elsewhere, primarily due to variances in the definitions and methodologies used to assess health care debt. Surveys have frequently concentrated on unpaid medical bills or those sent to collections, potentially overlooking individuals who finance their health care expenses through credit card debt, loans, or borrowing from family and friends. Therefore, the KFF Health Care Debt Survey offers a comprehensive perspective on health care debt, considering various types of debt incurred due to medical or dental expenses, as well as debts related to someone else’s care, such as that of a child, spouse, or parent.

Numerous older adults are managing their health care bills via credit card debt or other borrowing methods (Figure 2). Approximately 10% of Medicare-age adults report having medical or dental expenses they are paying down directly to a provider (12%), charged to a credit card and being paid off over time (11%), are overdue or unmanageable (8%), or carry debts owed to a financial institution or collection agency due to loans taken to settle medical expenses (7%). A smaller segment reported owing money to family or friends to cover medical or dental costs (3%).

About 39% of Medicare-age adults with health care debt owe less than $1,000, with 19% owing less than $500. Conversely, 11% of those with health care debt owe $10,000 or more (data not shown). Even smaller amounts of debt can adversely affect credit ratings.

Health care debt among older adults originates from various sources, including common health care services (Figure 3). Nearly half of Medicare-age adults with health care debt attribute some of their bills to lab fees and diagnostic exams (49%), dental care (48%), and doctor consultations (41%). One-third (31%) cite emergency services as a factor, and one-quarter (24%) relate it to prescription drug costs. Dental care is a leading contributor to health care debt among Medicare-age adults, probably because traditional Medicare does not encompass dental services. (While most Medicare Advantage plans provide some dental coverage, the extent of this coverage can vary significantly, and enrollees might still face considerable out-of-pocket expenses.)

Only 6% of Medicare-age adults attribute some of their debt to costs for long-term care services and support, such as nursing home care, assisted living, or round-the-clock in-home health aide services. While utilized extensively by a smaller portion of the Medicare population, these services can be extremely expensive. For instance, in 2023, the median annual cost for a private room in a nursing home was $116,800, while round-the-clock home health aide services cost $288,288. These costs significantly surpass the median income ($36,000 per individual) and savings ($103,800 per individual) of the average Medicare beneficiary in 2023. Medicare does not typically cover these services, rendering them financially inaccessible for many older adults and resulting in potentially significant debt. (Survey results may underrepresent the expenses and related debt incurred by individuals in nursing homes, assisted living centers, and similar institutional setups, although the survey does account for debt related to long-term services and supports incurred by other family members.)

The financial implications of health care debt can be long-lasting. Nearly 30% of Medicare-age adults with health care debt (29%) reported that their household has been contacted by a collection agency due to medical or dental bills, while one-quarter (23%) indicated that their credit score has suffered as a result of health care debt (Figure 4). For retirees facing health care debt, such consequences may be challenging to reverse, complicating the acquisition of affordable credit in the future. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau recently suggested a regulatory change aimed at removing most health care bills from credit reports and preventing lenders from considering medical information in loan decisions, intending to alleviate the burden of health care debt for US adults and protect against coercive credit reporting issues.

Forty-two percent of Medicare-age adults with health care debt report that they or another household member have reduced spending on essential items (42%) or depleted a significant portion of their savings (39%) in the last five years due to their health care debt (Figure 5). One-third have withdrawn money from long-term savings accounts like retirement funds (34%) or increased their credit card debt for non-medical expenditures (31%), and one in five have borrowed money (21%) or delayed payment of other bills (18%). Such sacrifices can pose serious risks to financial stability and overall well-being, potentially perpetuating the cycle of health care debt by leaving older adults with fewer resources for necessary health-related expenses.

Sixty-two percent of Medicare-age adults with health care debt (62%) report that they or another household member have delayed, missed, or sought alternatives for necessary health care or prescription medications due to expenses (Figure 6). Nearly half (48%) of these adults postponed necessary medical care in the past year, two in five (43%) opted for home remedies or over-the-counter medicines instead of visiting a healthcare provider, and one-third advised against getting a recommended medical test or treatment (31%) or reduced their prescribed medication dosage by skipping doses, cutting pills, or not filling their prescriptions (28%).



Source link

Domestic partner health insurance: a coverage option for unmarried couples


If you’re in a relationship deemed a domestic partnership, your access to your domestic partner’s health insurance, or their access to yours, will depend on where you live and your health plan’s rules.

Here’s what you need to know:

What is a domestic partnership?

A domestic partnership – officially recognized in some states and municipalities but not by the federal government – represents a committed relationship between two people, but it does not confer the same rights and protections as marriage.

Same-sex couples no longer need to rely on domestic partnerships since they can legally marry in every state as a result of the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. But as cohabitation rates have increased in the U.S., some couples – gay or straight – choose to enter into a domestic partnership rather than marriage, in the areas where this is an option.

Since domestic partnerships are not recognized or defined by the federal government, the specifics vary by state and by city (including whether domestic partnerships are recognized, and if so, what’s required in terms of how long the couple has cohabitated, financial interdependence, etc.). In some cases, registered domestic partnerships are only available to state employees or local government employees.

Which states recognize domestic partnerships?

Connecticut and New Jersey recognize domestic partnerships statewide for any couples who meet the state requirements. In Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Massachusetts, Montana, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont, domestic partnership health benefits are available to state employees. There are also numerous cities throughout the United States (including some in the aforementioned states) where residents can register their domestic partnerships.

This just means that domestic partnership registration is available in all of those areas. It doesn’t mean, however, that private health plans or employers in those cities or states are required to provide domestic partner health benefits. In some cases, there are local rules that require plans or employers that offer spousal benefits to also extend them to domestic partnerships, but the specifics vary from one area to another.

But even if you’re in an area where domestic partnerships are not formally recognized by the state or local government, your employer might choose to offer domestic partnership health insurance benefits. You’ll need to check with your employer to see whether this is the case, and if so, what they require as proof of domestic partnership.

Are domestic partner health benefits the same for same-sex and opposite-sex couples?

Before the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling, same-sex couples could only get married in certain states. Domestic partnerships were an alternative in some states, providing some of the benefits that opposite-sex couples could obtain via marriage.

Since 2015, same-sex marriage has been legal in every state and same-sex partners no longer have to rely on domestic partnerships.

However, domestic partnerships are still available in some areas and domestic partnership health benefits are offered by some employers. The requirements to register or swear an affidavit of a domestic partnership differ by area and by employer. For example, you may need to be a government employee, or you may need to be at least 62 years old. (Some areas allow older individuals to avoid losing access to Social Security benefits under a former spouse’s record, which could happen if they remarried.)

But if domestic partnership benefits are available, they’re available on the same terms to same-sex and opposite-sex couples, just like marriage.

Do Marketplace plans offer domestic partnership health insurance benefits?

If you buy your own (non-group) health insurance, the insurer may either allow you to be on the same policy with your domestic partner or require you to have separate policies. This will vary depending on where you live and the health plan you select.

Most people who buy their own health insurance do so through the health insurance Marketplace (exchange), but it’s also possible to buy individual/family health insurance directly from an insurance company (albeit without Marketplace subsidies). In both cases, the option to purchase a single policy to cover yourself and your domestic partner will depend on whether your domestic partnership is registered with your state or municipality, on local rules applicable to domestic partnerships, and on the health plan’s rules.

If you’re in a state or municipality that recognizes domestic partnerships, the registration of your domestic partnership may or may not be considered a qualifying life event that triggers a special enrollment period. For example, it is not a qualifying life event in states that use HealthCare.gov, but it is a qualifying life event in California’s state-run Marketplace.

Is my employer required to provide health insurance that includes domestic partnership benefits?

In some states and municipalities, employers that offer spousal health benefits are required to extend their benefit offers to registered domestic partners. Absent this sort of local requirement, employers can choose to offer health benefits to domestic partners, and some do so.

To be clear, employers – even large employers that are subject to the ACA’s employer mandate – are never required to offer coverage to employees’ spouses. But nearly all employers that offer health benefits do allow employees to add their legally married spouse to the plan.

However, only about a third of employers that offer health benefits allow employees to add a domestic partner to the group plan.

It’s also important to note that employers can choose to provide their employees with domestic partner benefits even if domestic partnership is not legally recognized in that state or municipality. In that case, the employer can set their own eligibility rules for domestic partner health insurance. (They may, for instance require that the domestic partners live together for a certain amount of time, be 18 or older, or have joint finances or shared property.)

How do I add my domestic partner to my health insurance?

If your employer offers domestic partner health benefits, you should be able to add your domestic partner to your policy during your employer’s open enrollment period or during a special enrollment period triggered by a qualifying life event. (The timing of open enrollment differs from one employer to another.)

But while getting married will trigger a special enrollment period that allows you to add your spouse to your group health plan, obtaining an affidavit of domestic partnership is not a federally recognized qualifying life event.

If your employer offers domestic partner health benefits, they may offer a special enrollment period that begins when you register your domestic partnership with your state or municipality. But this enrollment opportunity will vary depending on the applicable insurance plan and carrier, the employer’s business needs and coverage rules, and state requirements regarding domestic partnerships.

You should check with your employer to find out whether they offer domestic partner health insurance benefits, and if so, what they require as proof of domestic partnership.

If you have a Marketplace plan, you’ll need to check with your plan to see whether you can add a domestic partner to your plan, and if so, what documentation will be needed. As noted above, access to a Marketplace special enrollment period due to registration of a domestic partnership will vary by state.

Frequently asked questions about domestic partner health insurance

Frequently asked questions about domestic partner health insurance


Do I need a domestic partner affidavit for health insurance?

If your employer offers domestic partner health insurance, you will likely need to provide proof of your domestic partnership to add your partner to your health insurance.

Depending on the employer and where you live, this can be either proof of a registered domestic partnership (meaning you’ve registered your domestic partnership with the state or local government) or proof of an employer-defined domestic partnership.

Employer-defined domestic partnerships have requirements set by the employer, and can be offered by employers in areas where domestic partnerships are not recognized by the state or local government. These employers will typically require an affidavit in which the employee attests that their relationship meets the employer’s requirements for a domestic partnership.

If you buy your own health insurance, through the Marketplace or directly through an insurer, access to plan that will cover you and your domestic partner on the same policy will depend on where you live and the health plan’s rules. An insurance carrier may ask for a domestic partnership affidavit. And particularly if you’re using the registration of a new domestic partnership to obtain a special enrollment period in a state where that’s available, you should expect to have to submit proof of the domestic partnership registration.


How do Obamacare subsidies work for a domestic partnership?

Most Marketplace enrollees qualify for premium tax credits (premium subsidies). Premium subsidies are a tax credit based on the total annual income earned by everyone in the enrollee’s tax household (everyone listed on your tax return).

Married Marketplace enrollees must file a joint tax return to qualify for a premium tax credit. But domestic partners cannot file a joint tax return. And HealthCare.gov clarifies that applicants should not count a domestic partner as part of their household unless they have a child together or will claim the domestic partner as a dependent on their tax return. (Note that even if domestic partners share a child, they still have to file separate tax returns; either parent, but not both, can claim the child as a dependent.)

Domestic partners file separate tax returns (assuming one is not the other’s tax dependent), and Marketplace premium tax credits are linked to an enrollee’s tax return. If both domestic partners filing separately are covered under one Marketplace policy, the premium tax credit can be allocated across both partners’ tax returns in any way they choose, or all of it can be reconciled on one partner’s tax return. The IRS explains the allocation of premium tax credits in the instructions for Form 8962, which is used to reconcile Marketplace premium tax credits after the coverage year is over. (To clarify, IRS rules for allocating premium tax credits are applicable in any situation where two or more tax households share a single Marketplace policy. That will typically be the case if domestic partners are allowed to enroll in one policy together, as domestic partners will file separate tax returns unless one is able to claim the other as a dependent.)


What is the domestic partner health insurance tax?

The domestic partner health insurance tax refers to the fact that the tax treatment of employer-sponsored health insurance isn’t the same for domestic partners as it is for spouses, it is not an actual tax imposed on domestic partnerships.

One of the benefits of employer-sponsored health insurance is that the premiums are typically paid on a pre-tax basis for the employee, their spouse, and their tax dependents. The portion of the premiums the employee pays is deducted from their paycheck before taxes are calculated, and the portion that the employer pays is not considered taxable compensation for the employee.

But the rules are different for domestic partner health insurance (unless your domestic partner is your tax dependent, which is possible only if their income is very low and they meet other IRS requirements).

Assuming your domestic partner cannot be claimed as your tax dependent, their coverage under your employer-sponsored health plan cannot be provided on a pre-tax basis. Instead, the fair market value of their health benefits is counted as taxable income for the employee.

The tax treatment of domestic partner health insurance is an important consideration to keep in mind when deciding whether to add your domestic partner to your employer’s health plan. The fact that the value of the coverage will be added to your taxable income might mean that it makes more sense for your partner to obtain their health coverage elsewhere. (To clarify, the portion that’s payroll deducted will not be paid with after-tax dollars and the portion that the employer pays – if any – will be subject to income tax and FICA tax.) The specifics will depend on your tax bracket, the fair market value of the domestic partner’s health insurance, and the other coverage alternatives available to your partner. You should consult a tax advisor or other trusted professional if you have questions or want guidance on your specific circumstances.

Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org.





Source link