Home Blog

2027 ACA open enrollment: What’s changing



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

The ACA (Affordable Care Act) open enrollment period for plan year 2027 begins November 1, 2026, in most states – and for people who buy their own health coverage, this year’s enrollment period comes with a number of important changes.

Insurers are leaving the Marketplace in more than 20 states, premiums are rising substantially in many areas, and federal rules have changed who will qualify for subsidies and how much consumers will pay out of pocket. There are also changes to Marketplace platforms, state-funded subsidies, HSA contribution limits, and Catastrophic plan eligibility.

Whether you already have Marketplace coverage or are shopping for a plan for the first time, you’ll want to carefully compare your 2027 options during open enrollment. Here’s a look at the key changes to know before you enroll.

Insurers are entering and exiting the Marketplace

As is always the case, insurers are joining the Marketplace in some areas, and others are exiting the Marketplace. For 2027, there are far more exits than entries.

  • Who’s affected? Hundreds of thousands of Marketplace enrollees have plans that will be terminated at the end of 2026 because of carrier exits. But in some states, many enrollees will have access to new plans due to a carrier entry.
  • What can you do? Carefully compare the plan options available to you during open enrollment. Don’t rely on auto-renewal. If your Marketplace plan is ending, the auto-renewal process will use an algorithm to pick a new plan for you, and it’s in your best interest to pick your own replacement plan. If new plans will be available in your area, comparison shopping during open enrollment will help you know whether any of those plans (or any other available plan) might be the best option for you.

What you need to know if your insurer is exiting the market.

Premiums will be higher on average, subsidies will also be larger

Nationwide, the median proposed rate increase (the midpoint of insurers’ proposed increases) for individual-market policies is about 15% for 2027. This means that roughly half of Marketplace insurers have proposed increases above 15% and the other half have proposed increases of less than 15%. The weighted average proposed increase (which accounts for how many people are enrolled in each insurer’s plans) ranges from under 7% in Vermont, Iowa, and Utah to 29% in Arizona.

But those increases are for full-price premiums, and most individual-market enrollees do not pay full price. The majority of people with individual-market coverage buy it through the Marketplace (as opposed to off-exchange). And 87% of Marketplace enrollees were receiving premium subsidies at the start of 2026.

Subsidy amounts are based on the cost of the second-lowest-cost Silver (benchmark) plan. When the benchmark plan’s premium increases, subsidies also increase. Many enrollees will be fully or partially insulated from the rising premiums, due to increases in their subsidy amounts. But the benchmark plan’s premium change won’t be the same as other plans’ premium changes, and people who don’t get a subsidy (including everyone who buys coverage outside the exchange) will bear the full brunt of the rate increases.

  • Who’s affected? More than 19 million people had Marketplace coverage as of early 2026, and the proposed rate increases also apply to off-exchange plans (where there are no subsidies available to offset the rate increases).
  • What can you do? Pay close attention to the renewal notices you get from your insurer and the Marketplace as we get closer to open enrollment. The notices will tell you your plan’s premium, and if applicable, your after-subsidy premium. Then you can comparison shop during open enrollment to see if a different plan might be a better value.

Out-of-pocket limits are increasing

For 2027 coverage, the maximum allowable out-of-pocket cap is $12,000 – up from $10,600 in 2026.

The Department of Health and Human Services set the $12,000 maximum in January 2026 using a formula set by the ACA. (In the spring of 2026, HHS finalized a rule that would have allowed some Bronze plans to have out-of-pocket limits as high as $15,600. But that was stayed by a court in July, so the highest out-of-pocket limit you’ll see for a single person in 2027 is $12,000.)

  • Who’s affected? The limit on out-of-pocket costs applies to all non-grandfathered (and non-grandmothered) individual and group health plans. Combined, these plans cover more than half of the population. Many plans have out-of-pocket caps that are well below the federal limits, but any individual or group plan can increase its out-of-pocket limit for 2027 as long as it doesn’t go over the federal limits.
  • What can you do? Pay close attention to any communications you get from your health plan, to see if there will be any changes in your deductible and total out-of-pocket exposure for the coming year.

Fewer immigrants will qualify for Marketplace subsidies

Starting with plan year 2027, the only immigrants who qualify for Marketplace subsidies will be:

  • Lawful Permanent Residents (LPR)
  • Cuban-Haitian Entrants (CHE)
  • Compact of Free Association (COFA) migrants.

All other immigrants will no longer qualify for Marketplace subsidies.

  • Who’s affected? Any non-citizens who aren’t in one of the three categories listed above. Immigrants who will no longer qualify for Marketplace subsidies include asylees, refugees, people with Temporary Protected Status (TPS), and people with various types of temporary visas, such as work visas, student visas, U-visas (for victims of certain crimes) and T-visas (for victims of trafficking). An estimated one million people are expected to become uninsured by 2035 as a result of this change.
  • What can you do? If you’re not a U.S. citizen and you currently have subsidized Marketplace coverage, be sure you understand whether your immigration status makes you eligible for ongoing subsidies in 2027. If not, you’ll want to understand how much full-price coverage will cost, and consider whether any of the lower-priced Marketplace plans in your area (a Bronze plan, for example) might be a better fit for your budget.

Oregon will utilize a state-run Marketplace platform

Starting this fall, Oregon residents will use the state-run Explore Health platform to obtain their coverage for 2027, instead of HealthCare.gov. Oregon is the latest state to switch from HealthCare.gov to a state-run Marketplace enrollment platform.

  • Who’s affected? Nearly 106,000 Oregon residents had Marketplace coverage as of early 2026, All of them will transition to Explore Health for 2027 if they wish to keep Marketplace coverage.
  • What can you do? If you’re in Oregon and have Marketplace coverage in 2026, pay close attention to any communications you get from HealthCare.gov and Explore Health (the Oregon Health Insurance Marketplace). Your account should be automatically migrated to the new platform, and you should receive details in early October about how to activate your new account. Window shopping will begin on the new platform on October 15, and open enrollment will begin November 1.

Virginia and Rhode Island introduce state-funded subsidies

For the 2027 plan year, Virginia is joining the list of states that offer state-funded health insurance subsidies in addition to the ACA’s federal subsidies. The Virginia Premium Savings program will be available starting November 1, 2026, when consumers are enrolling in coverage for 2027.

  • Who’s affected? People in Virginia who buy their own health insurance and have household incomes between 138% and 250% of the federal poverty level. For 2027 coverage, that amounts to:
    • Above $22,025 but not more than $39,900 for an individual.
    • Above $45,540 but not more than $82,500 for a family of four.
  • What can you do? If you’re in Virginia and your income makes you eligible for the new Virginia Premium Savings program, the subsidy will be automatically applied to any metal-level plan you select in the Virginia Marketplace. You won’t get the subsidy if you buy coverage outside the Marketplace, or if you buy a Catastrophic plan in the Marketplace.

Rhode Island’s Fiscal Year 2027 budget includes $19 million in state funding to replace some of the federal subsidy enhancements that expired at the end of 2025. But as of late August 2026, Rhode Island’s exchange has not yet clarified how eligibility for the state-funded subsidies will be determined.

HSA contribution limits will increase

As is the case each year, the IRS has indexed health savings account (HSA) contribution limits. If you have HSA-eligible health coverage in 2027, here’s how much you can contribute to an HSA:

  • Up to $4,500 if your HDHP covers just yourself.
  • Up to $9,000 if your HDHP also covers at least one additional family member.

In 2026, the contribution limits were $4,400 and $8,750, respectively.

Note: HSA contributions will lower your household income under the ACA’s rules for how modified adjusted gross income is calculated. This could make you eligible for a larger premium subsidy, or make you eligible for a subsidy when you would otherwise be over the “subsidy cliff.” It’s important to check with a tax advisor for any tax-related questions you might have.

  • Who’s affected? Anyone with an HSA-eligible high-deductible health plan (HDHP) who wants to contribute to an HSA in 2027. As was the case in 2026, all Marketplace Bronze and Catastrophic plans will continue to be HSA-eligible in 2027.
  • What can you do? If you’ll have an HSA-eligible HDHP in 2027, consider whether you’d like to make HSA contributions. You can make the contributions at any point during the year, or even up until the tax filing deadline in April 2028. The money you put into the HSA is pre-tax, and there’s no use-it-or-lose-it rule for HSAs. So if you don’t need to withdraw HSA funds to pay for medical expenses, they will remain in the account (along with any interest, dividends, or investment growth) and you can use the funds to pay medical bills in the future.

Learn more about how HSAs work.

Catastrophic plan eligibility will be further limited

Catastrophic plans are once again available only to people aged 30 or older who obtain a hardship or affordability exemption certificate (and who are in an area where Catastrophic plans are sold).

In September 2025, a Trump administration rule expanded access to Catastrophic plans, making them automatically available in most states to enrollees who didn’t qualify for Marketplace subsidies. That rule was expanded in 2026 to apply nationwide.

But in July 2026, a judge stayed the new rule. That means eligibility for Catastrophic plans is once again limited to the pre-September 2025 rules: a person who is 30 or older must obtain a hardship or affordability exemption certificate to purchase a Catastrophic plan.

Learn more about Catastrophic health plans.



Source link

Who Do We Trust to Decide What Health Care Gets Covered, and at What Price? 



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

KFF designs, conducts and analyzes original public opinion and survey research on Americans’ attitudes, knowledge, and experiences with the health care system to help amplify the public’s voice in major national debates.



Source link

Protected: Is Prior Authorization a Blessing or a Curse?



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.



Source link

What Do We Get for the Cut Health Insurers Take?



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

KFF designs, conducts and analyzes original public opinion and survey research on Americans’ attitudes, knowledge, and experiences with the health care system to help amplify the public’s voice in major national debates.



Source link

Are Health Insurers Providing Good Value?



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

KFF designs, conducts and analyzes original public opinion and survey research on Americans’ attitudes, knowledge, and experiences with the health care system to help amplify the public’s voice in major national debates.



Source link

What’s Driving Rising Health Premiums?



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

KFF designs, conducts and analyzes original public opinion and survey research on Americans’ attitudes, knowledge, and experiences with the health care system to help amplify the public’s voice in major national debates.



Source link

Why Does Health Insurance Cost So Much?



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

KFF designs, conducts and analyzes original public opinion and survey research on Americans’ attitudes, knowledge, and experiences with the health care system to help amplify the public’s voice in major national debates.



Source link

Are Health Insurers to Blame for Our Health System Problems? 



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

KFF designs, conducts and analyzes original public opinion and survey research on Americans’ attitudes, knowledge, and experiences with the health care system to help amplify the public’s voice in major national debates.



Source link

Examining LGBTQ+ Adults’ Experiences with Health Care Costs and Access



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

Key Takeaways

  • LGBTQ+ adults face significantly greater challenges accessing and affording health care compared to their non-LGBTQ+ peers. They are more likely to postpone or skip needed care (58% vs. 38%), forgo prescription medications due to cost (22% vs. 12%), and struggle to pay medical bills (30% vs. 21%).
  • Cost-related barriers to care are especially pronounced among certain segments of the LGBTQ+ population, most notably trans adults, younger LGBTQ+ adults, those with lower incomes, and those without health coverage. Eight in ten (82%) trans adults, three-quarters (77%) of LGBTQ+ adults without health coverage, and two-thirds (68%) of those under age 30 report not getting needed health care in the past 12 months either because they couldn’t get an appointment, couldn’t afford the cost, or for another reason. Additionally, larger shares of LGBQ+ women than men report skipping or delaying care in the past year (63% vs. 46%).
  • While trans adults represent a small share of the total LGBTQ+ population, they experience outsized barriers to affording care and other access issues. Compared with other LGBQ+ groups, trans adults report the highest rates of difficulty finding providers with available appointments (53%), not taking prescription medications because of cost (39%), worsening health from postponed care (45%), struggling with medical bills (42%), and experiencing insurance delays or denials (61%). Trans adults experience these greater barriers to health cost and access even when controlling for other demographic variables such as age, income, and insurance status.
  • Health care costs create significant financial strain for many LGBTQ+ adults. Three in ten (30%) report problems paying medical bills in the past year, and one in five (19%) say they cut back on household necessities such as food or clothing to pay for health care costs. Financial burdens are particularly common among younger adults, those with lower incomes, and those without health coverage.
  • Having health insurance does not guarantee timely access to care. About three in ten LGBTQ+ insured adults report that their insurance delayed or denied coverage for recommended care in the past two years, a more widespread experience than among non-LGBTQ+ insured adults, with particularly high rates among trans adults and those covered by Medicaid or those with ACA marketplace coverage.

Understanding the Challenges LGBTQ+ Adults Face Affording Health Care

LGBTQ+ adults in the U.S. are a growing population who have historically faced health disparities in terms of both wellbeing and health care access and affordability. Previous research has found that LGBTQ+ adults are more likely than their non-LGBTQ+ peers to experience barriers to obtaining needed care, to struggle to afford health care costs, and to delay or forgo care because of cost. These affordability challenges often intersect with and may even be a driver of broader health disparities, including poorer mental and physical health outcomes, particularly among trans adults.

Understanding the financial challenges LGBTQ+ adults face when accessing health care can help identify persistent gaps in affordability and inform efforts to improve access to needed care and coverage.

LGBTQ+ definition and demographics

The LGBTQ+ sample included in this analysis is comprised of 2,640 adults, including 52% who identify as bisexual, 21% as gay men, 9% as lesbian women, 9% as transgender, and 9% who use some other term to identify themselves. The analysis is broken out by transgender (trans) adults (9%), lesbian, gay, bisexual or other queer identifying men (39%), and lesbian, gay, bisexual, or other queer identifying women (50%).

The LGBTQ+ community is not a monolith and beyond differences related to sexual orientation and gender identity, health care experiences can vary widely depending on age, income, and insurance status, among other factors. This analysis also examines differences by these factors. For example, regardless of LGBTQ+ identity, women tend to have more interactions with the health care system than men and therefore, may have more cost or access issues. In addition, trans adults are more likely than other groups to face barriers in health care, including discrimination and lack of providers trained to handle the health needs of trans adults. Subgroups of the LGBTQ+ population, including trans adults or older adults usually make up too small a share of national survey samples to allow for statistically reliable analysis. The large sample size of this survey provides a unique opportunity to examine these differences.

This report also compares the experiences of LGBTQ+ adults with their non-LGBTQ+ counterparts. A caveat to these comparisons is that there are key demographic differences between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ adults that may contribute to differences in measures of health care cost and access between these populations. LGBTQ+ people are generally younger than the U.S. population overall, have lower incomes, and are somewhat more likely to be uninsured. Therefore, some findings might be more reflective of income or coverage differences, for example, than LGBTQ+ identity, though those factors are certainly intertwined. See appendix for a more detailed analysis of the demographic characteristics of the LGBTQ+ community.

Delays in Health Care for LGBTQ+ Adults

Six in ten LGBTQ+ adults (58%) say they have skipped or postponed needed health care in the past year, greater shares than their non-LGBTQ+ counterparts (38%). This includes more than four in ten (43%) LGBTQ+ adults who say they’ve skipped or delayed getting needed care because of the cost and about three in ten who said it was due to their inability to get an appointment (28%) or for some other reason (29%). LGBTQ+ adults are nearly twice as likely as non-LGBTQ+ adults (26%) to say they’ve skipped or delayed getting needed care because of the costs.

Compared to other LGBQ+ adults, trans adults are more likely to report they have put off care in the past year because of cost or other issues (82%). At least half of trans adults say they skipped or postponed getting needed health care because of the cost (56%), because they couldn’t find a doctor or health care provider with appointments available (53%), or they skipped or postponed for any other reasons (48%). There may be many reasons why trans adults are more likely to skip or delay care, but a recent KFF/Washington Post Trans Survey found significant barriers for trans adults in getting needed health care, including providers not being properly educated to provide appropriate care.

Beyond trans adults, larger shares of LGBQ+ women than men report skipping or postponing care in the past year (63% vs. 46%). This includes half of LGBQ+ women who say they skipped or postponed needed care because of the cost (compared to a third of LGBQ+ men), and roughly a third of LGBQ+ women who say they skipped or postponed care because they couldn’t get an appointment (31% vs. 19% of LGBQ+ men) or for any reason besides cost or not being able to get an appointment (32% vs. 21% of LGBQ+ men). Across all LGBTQ+ groups, non-LGBTQ+ adults less commonly reported skipping or postponing care.  

Many socioeconomic and demographic factors can predict delaying or skipping care, but LGBTQ+ adults are more likely to skip or delay care even when controlling for race and ethnicity, insurance coverage, age, income, and education, suggesting this population group may have unique struggles in accessing needed health care. The differences reported in this analysis between LGBTQ+ adults and non-LGBTQ+ adults hold even when controlling for these demographic characteristics.

Six in Ten LGBTQ+ Adults Have Missed Needed Care Because of Cost or Other Reasons in the Past Year (Split Bars)

Among all LGBTQ+ adults, two-thirds (68%) of those under age 30 report having put off needed care in the past year, higher than the shares of older LGBTQ+ adults who report this. While age is a significant predictor of putting off care regardless of sexual identity, LGBTQ+ adults under age 30 are twenty percentage points more likely to report putting off care than non-LGBTQ+ adults in the same age range (48%). In fact, across most age groups, LGBTQ+ adults are more likely to report putting off or postponing needed care than their non-LGBTQ+ counterparts, except for those 65 and older. The difference between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ adults levels out among those age 65 and older, which may be due to several factors, such as increased medical care among older adults and Medicare eligibility.

LGBTQ+ Adults Are More Likely Than Non-LGBTQ+ Adults in Same Age Groups To Report Missing Care, Including More Than Two-Thirds of Those Under Age 30 (Split Bars)

Insurance and income also play a role in accessing care. Three in four (77%) LGBTQ+ adults without health insurance report having missed or delayed care in the past year for any reason, compared to six in ten LGBTQ+ adults with health insurance. Fewer non-LGBTQ+ adults than LGBTQ+ adults without health insurance report experiencing any of the following in the past year (65% vs. 77% of uninsured LGBTQ+ adults).

Three-Quarters of LGBTQ+ Adults Without Insurance Report Missing Care for Any Reason in the Past Year (Split Bars)

Similarly, about six in ten LGBTQ+ adults with household incomes under $40,000 a year (59%) or between $40,000 and $99,999 a year (63%) say they skipped or postponed needed care, compared to half of those with annual incomes of $100,000 or more. Even among the highest income groups or those with health insurance, LGBTQ+ adults are more likely than non-LGBTQ+ adults to say they skipped or delayed needed care in the past year.

LGBTQ+ Adults With Lower Household Incomes Are More Likely To Have Missed Needed Care in the Past Year (Split Bars)

Substantial shares of LGBTQ+ adults report postponing their care worsened their health, and that number is especially pronounced among trans adults. Three in ten (29%) LGBTQ+ adults say their health got worse because they skipped or delayed care, which is about twice the share of non-LGBTQ+ adults who report the same (14%). This experience is more common among LGBQ+ women (34%) than LGBQ+ men (20%). Almost half (45%) of trans adults say they delayed or skipped care and their health got worse as a result.

Three in Ten LGBTQ+ Adults, Including Almost Half of Trans Adults Report Their Health Worsened Because They Didn’t Get or Postponed Care (Stacked Bars)

The share who say their health got worse due to postponing care also rises to roughly a third of uninsured LGBTQ+ adults (35%) and those under age 30 (35%). One-third (33%) of LGBTQ+ adults with household incomes of less than $40,000 report that their health got worse because of postponed care.

Younger, Uninsured, Lower Income LGBTQ+ Adults More Likely To Say Their Health Worsened as a Result of Postponed Care (Stacked Bars)

Impacts of Cost on Prescription Medications

Cost barriers also affect prescription medication behavior, including among LGBTQ+ adults, with about a fifth of LGBTQ+ adults (22%) saying they’ve cut pills in half, skipped doses of a medication, or decided not to fill a prescription because they couldn’t afford the cost (compared to 12% of non-LGBTQ+ adults). Trans adults (39%), LGBTQ+ adults without insurance (28%), LGBQ+ women (25%), and younger LGBTQ+ adults (23% of those under age 30), are the most likely to report that they didn’t take their prescription medication as prescribed due to cost.

In addition, around a quarter of LGBTQ+ adults with lower incomes report cutting pills in half, skipping doses of medications, or not filling a prescription in the past year due to cost, including 27% of those with a household income of less than $40,000 a year, and 24% of those with incomes between $40,000 and $99,999 a year, compared to around one in ten (12%) of LGBTQ+ adults with incomes of $100,000 or more a year.

A Quarter of LGBTQ+ Adults Report Not Taking Medications As Prescribed in the Last Year Because of the Cost (Split Bars)

Difficulty Paying Medical Bills

Substantial shares of LGBTQ+ adults also report struggling with medical bills. Three in ten LGBTQ+ adults say they have had problems paying for or were unable to pay a medical bill, including bills for doctors, tests or labs, or medication in the past 12 months, higher than the 21% of non-LGBTQ+ adults who say the same. This includes four in ten (42%) trans adults, over a third (36%) of LGBQ+ women and two in ten (21%) LGBQ+ men.

Problems with bills can lead to important financial consequences for many LGBTQ+ adults. Two in ten (19%) LGBTQ+ adults, including two in ten (22%) LGBQ+ women and roughly one in ten (13%) LGBQ+ men say they’ve had to cut back on household expenses like food, clothing, or other basic household items in order to pay for health care costs. This experience is more common among trans adults, over one quarter of whom (28%) report the same. Overall, LGBTQ+ adults report they have cut back on necessities to pay for health care costs more commonly than non-LGBTQ+ adults (13%).

Three in Ten LGBTQ+ Adults Had Problems Paying Medical Bills in the Past Year and Significant Shares Cut Back on Household Expenses To Pay Costs (Split Bars)

Younger LGBTQ+ adults and those with lower household incomes, two groups with considerable overlap, are among the most likely to report problems paying medical bills in the past year, with around a third of those under age 30 (33%), between 30 and 49 (34%), those with incomes of less than $40,000 a year (35%) or between $40,000 and $99,999 (35%) reporting they had problems paying or an inability to pay for any medical bills in the past year. Individuals earning over $100,000 annually and those 65 and older, who are largely covered by Medicare, are less likely to report such problems.

Younger LGBTQ+ adults and those with lower incomes are also more likely to report cutting back on expenses because of their problems paying medical bills. Overall, a quarter (24%) of LGBTQ+ adults with household incomes less than $40,000 a year say they have cut back on household expenses like food, clothing or other basic household items to pay for health care costs, compared to two in ten (19%) LGBTQ+ adults with incomes between $40,000 and $99,999 and one in ten (11%) of those with incomes of $100,000 or more a year.

Younger LGBTQ+ adults are also more likely to report cutting back on expenses because of trouble paying medical bills, including two in ten LGBTQ+ adults under age 30 and between ages 30 to 49 (21% for each) compared to one in ten (13%) LGBTQ+ adults ages 50 to 64 and one in twelve (8%) of those ages 65 and older.

Younger LGBTQ+ Adults, Those With Lower Incomes Are More Likely To Have Problems Paying Bills and To Cut Back To Pay for Costs (Split Bars)

Insurance Delays or Denials

Treatments or medications recommended by a provider may be delayed, and in some cases, an insurance company may deny coverage for the recommended medication or treatment after or during the care process. While insurance coverage helps some LGBTQ+ adults deal with access and cost issues, many face other challenges such as delayed or denied care.

Roughly one-third of insured LGBTQ+ adults say their insurance company denied coverage (32%) or delayed (30%) their ability to get a health care service, treatment, or medication that their doctor prescribed in the past two years. Four in ten say coverage has either been delayed or denied. These shares are substantially higher than among non-LGBTQ+ adults, about a quarter (26%) of whom say they’ve experienced a denial of service (21%) or delay (17%) in the past two years.

These experiences are particularly common among trans adults, roughly six in ten (61%) of whom say they’ve been delayed (53%) or denied (45%) coverage by their insurance for a service, treatment, or medication prescribed by their doctor in the past two years.

Four in Ten Insured LGBTQ+ Adults, Including Larger Shares of Trans Adults Report Their Insurance Company Has Delayed or Denied Needed Coverage in the Past Two Years (Split Bars)

Delays and denials of coverage for LGBTQ+ adults vary based on what type of insurance they have. Individuals with either self-purchased plans or Medicaid report experiencing these most often. Roughly half (48%) of LGBTQ+ adults under age 65 who have Medicaid (48%) or self-purchased insurance (46%) say their insurance company has denied or delayed health care services, treatments, or medications in the past two years. Given that Medicaid plays a larger role in covering LGBTQ+ people, this coverage difference may in partially explain some of the disparate challenges this group faces with delays and denials.  

Roughly four in ten (39%) LGBTQ+ adults under age 65 with employer-sponsored insurance say the same while just three in ten (28%) LGBTQ+ adults ages 65 and older with Medicare report experiencing recent delays and denials.

The share of LGBTQ+ adults with various types of health insurance who report delays or denials of needed care is larger than the share of non-LGBTQ+ adults who say the same. Roughly a third of those non-LGBTQ+ adults with Medicaid (33%) or self-purchased insurance (31%), around a quarter (26%) of those with employer-sponsored coverage, and around two in ten (18%) of non-LGBTQ+ adults who have Medicare and are ages 65 or older report these issues.

Large Shares of LGBTQ+ Adults Under Age 65 on Medicaid Report Delays or Denials of Needed Coverage in the Past Two Years (Split Bars)



Source link

How Much and Why Premiums Are Going Up for Small Businesses in 2027



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

Small businesses that offer health insurance to their employees could see health costs rise in 2027, according to an analysis of preliminary rate filings from all 50 states and DC. Nearly 300 insurers offering small group coverage reported a median proposed premium increase of 14% for next year.

Small group insurers say rising medical prices, including for hospitalizations, physician care, and prescription drugs, and increased utilization are major drivers of the premium increases. Among the other drivers, insurers point to the continued decline in small group plan enrollment, as more small businesses shift to alternative coverage options like self-insurance or stop offering health coverage altogether to lower costs.

The full analysis and other data on health costs are available on the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, an online information hub dedicated to monitoring and assessing the performance of the U.S. health system.



Source link