Home Blog Page 11

Understanding Various Measures to Assess Hospital Finances: A Cheat Sheet



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

Profit margins are the most common measure of financial performance. They can be positive (if the hospital earns a profit) or negative (if the hospital loses money). Reported margins vary depending on the measure used, how the measure is calculated, the data, accounting decisions, and how data are summarized (e.g., averages vs medians). Several other measures are also useful for understanding a hospital’s financial position, such as days cash on hand. Comparing measures across hospitals can be difficult due to a lack of standardized reporting requirements. Explore more key facts about hospitals and their finances.



Source link

What can you do if you’re feeling Marketplace sticker shock?



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

If you’ve looked at your 2026 Marketplace health insurance options and you’re feeling sticker shock because you’re seeing significantly larger premiums, don’t panic just yet. Here’s what you need to know as open enrollment for 2026 health coverage gets underway.

Who’s experiencing Marketplace sticker shock?

For the 93% of Marketplace (exchange) enrollees who are receiving premium subsidies (premium tax credits) for 2025 coverage, the after-subsidy premium for the benchmark (second-lowest-cost Silver) plan is projected to increase by 114% in 2026, unless Congress takes action to extend the subsidy enhancements that are scheduled to expire at the end of 2025.

For the 7% of Marketplace enrollees who don’t get subsidies – plus anyone who buys ACA-compliant individual market coverage outside the exchange – full-price (unsubsidized) premiums are increasing by an average of 26%, although this will vary considerably from one policy to another.

There are more than 23 million people with Marketplace coverage, and given the average rate increases, most of them could be experiencing some degree of sticker shock when they look at their 2026 premiums.

Here are five steps you can take to better understand changes in Marketplace insurance costs and take action during open enrollment.

1. Review the available plans. (Those won’t change.)

Insurers have finalized and received regulatory approval for the individual-market plans that are available in each state’s Marketplace for 2026. So although after-subsidy premiums could change if Congress takes action to extend or modify the subsidy enhancements, the coverage details of the available plans will not change.

That means you can take some time now to review details like deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums, covered drug lists, and provider networks, to get an idea of what your coverage options are for 2026. Your current plan might not be available for 2026, or there might be new plans available in your area, depending on where you live. And even in areas where plans continue to be offered by the same insurers that offered them in 2025, there could be changes in the coverage specifics.

2. Understand your income as a percentage of the federal poverty level (FPL)

Your eligibility for 2026 Marketplace premium subsidies is based on how your projected 2026 household income compares to the 2025 federal poverty level. (Note that these numbers are higher in Alaska and Hawaii.)

Here’s how household income (MAGI) is calculated under the ACA.

Unless Congress extends the subsidy enhancements, enrollees will no longer be eligible for premium subsidies in 2026 if their 2026 household income is more than 400% of the 2025 FPL. If you’re in the continental United States, here’s what 400% of FPL amounts to in annual income, for 2026 coverage:

  • Household of one: $62,600
  • Household of two: $84,600
  • Household of three: $106,600
  • Household of four: $128,600
  • Household of five: $150,600
  • Household of six: $172,600

This is why – unless Congress extends the subsidy enhancements – you’ll see no subsidy at all in the Marketplace if your projected household income is above those amounts. (If you’re in Massachusetts, New Jersey, or New Mexico, you may still see some subsidies, as those states have state-funded subsidies that extend to enrollees with incomes above 400% of FPL.)

3. Understand how HSA contributions can affect your MAGI

Consider a 60-year-old living in Atlanta, earning $63,000. (Here’s how ACA-specific modified adjusted gross income, or MAGI, is calculated.) At that income level, they’re just a little above 400% of FPL, which means they won’t qualify for any subsidy at all in 2026 if Congress doesn’t extend the subsidy enhancements. In that case, the lowest-cost plan available to this person will cost $1,079/month in premiums in 2026, which amounts to more than 20% of their household income.

But that lowest-cost option is a Bronze plan, and all Bronze Marketplace plans will allow enrollees to contribute to a health savings account (HSA) in 2026. So if this person enrolls in that Bronze plan, opens an HSA, and contributes just $1,000 to the HSA in 2026, that would bring their household income down to $62,000, which is just a little under 400% of FPL.

That would allow them to avoid the “subsidy cliff,” and would make them eligible for a significant subsidy. Their after-subsidy premium for that lowest-cost plan will drop to just $262/month – simply because they enrolled in an HSA-eligible plan, opted to contribute $1,000 to an HSA, and thus reduced their MAGI by $1,000.

That $1,000 HSA contribution (which is still their own money, and available at any time to pay for medical expenses on a pre-tax basis) results in them qualifying for a subsidy of $817/month, which covers the majority of the cost of their coverage.

This is just one example, and the specifics will vary depending on where you live, how old you are, how much you earn, and how much you’re able to contribute to an HSA. The maximum allowable HSA contribution for 2026 is $4,400 if you have self-only coverage, and $8,750 if your HSA-eligible health plan also covers at least one additional family member.

We recommend that you speak with a tax advisor if you’re considering this strategy, as there are tax ramifications when you make adjustments to your income. You should be aware of all of them before making any financial decisions.

4. Update your Marketplace account

Now is a good time to make sure your Marketplace account is up to date. If there have been any changes in your household or your income since the last time you updated your Marketplace account, be sure to report those changes to the Marketplace.

It’s particularly important to project your income as accurately as possible for 2026, and keep the Marketplace updated if you realize mid-year that your income projection wasn’t correct. This is because 2026 will be the first year when there’s no cap on how much excess advance premium tax credit (APTC) has to be repaid to the IRS.

If you underestimate your income and then end up earning more than you projected, there will be no limit on how much excess APTC you have to repay to the IRS when you file your taxes in early 2027.

5. Remember the Dec. 15 deadline (in most states) and stay tuned for updates

You have until at least December 15 (or later in some states) to pick a Marketplace plan that will take effect on January 1, 2026. So if you’re experiencing sticker shock when you see the prices that are currently displayed for 2026 coverage, you have a couple of options:

You can select a plan now, based on the prices that reflect the expiration of the subsidy enhancements.

If you do this, stay tuned for updates about the subsidy enhancements. If Congress later extends the subsidy enhancements or extends a modified version of them during open enrollment, you’ll have the option to pick a different plan if that’s your preference. The last plan you pick will take effect January 1, as long as you make the plan selection by December 15 (or the deadline in your state).

You can hold off on picking a plan for now, and stay tuned for updates regarding the federal subsidy enhancements.

If you decide to delay enrollment in the hopes that the subsidy enhancements will be extended by Congress, be sure to set a calendar reminder to enroll in a plan before December 15. If you don’t, your current Marketplace coverage will be auto-renewed. (If you’re currently uninsured, you’ll continue to be uninsured in January.) But actively selecting your own plan is generally a better option than relying on auto-renewal.

Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written hundreds of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org.





Source link

How Do Enrollees with Private Health Insurance Use Remote Monitoring Technologies?



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

This Healthy System Tracker analysis, authored by KFF and the Peterson Center on Healthcare, examines remote monitoring technologies, identifying the types of patients and health conditions they serve and what is spent on these services. There are an estimated 300,000 adults with employer-sponsored health coverage for whom insurers received at least one remote monitoring claim in 2023.

Among adults under 65 with private health insurance, older people and women are most likely to use remote monitoring. These services are mostly used for people with hypertension and other circulatory diseases, and musculoskeletal conditions. The median cost of remote monitoring varies, ranging from $55 a month ($12 out of pocket) for a clinician to monitor physical data, such as blood pressure, to $78 a month ($21 out of pocket) for a provider to monitor self-reported data, such as pain.

The full analysis and other data on health costs are available on the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, an online information hub dedicated to monitoring and assessing the performance of the U.S. health system.



Source link

KFF Health Tracking Poll: Public Weighs in on Health Care Debate and Government Shutdown 



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

Key Takeaways

  • On October 1st the U.S. federal government shut down after Congress failed to pass a stopgap spending bill to keep it funded. Now in its sixth week, the shutdown marks the longest lapse in federal funding in U.S. history. Congress remains at a standstill over whether to extend the Affordable Care Act’s enhanced premium tax credits (ePTCs). About three quarters of the public continue to say Congress should extend the expiring tax credits, including more than nine in ten (94%) Democrats, three in four (76%) independents, and half of Republicans. As the debate continues, this poll shows that partisan loyalties among the public are deepening, with Republicans split over whether they want Congress to extend the tax credits for people who purchase their own coverage on the ACA marketplaces or allow them to expire.
  • Democrats largely support what congressional Democrats have been doing throughout this debate, while independents are split. A large majority of Democrats (81%) say Democrats in Congress should “refuse to approve a budget unless it includes extending these tax credits, even if it means the government remains shut down.” Independents are divided, while about eight in ten (84%) Republicans say Congressional Democrats should approve a budget to quickly end the shutdown.
  • If the enhanced tax credits are not extended, both political parties could face backlash from their bases. Among those who want to see Congress extend the tax credits, nearly four in ten say President Trump (28% of all adults) deserves most of the blame, and a similar share says they would blame Republicans in Congress (28% of all adults). Fewer, about one in four (17% of all adults), say Democrats in Congress deserve the most blame. Majorities of Democrats and independents say President Trump or Republicans in Congress would deserve the most blame, while a majority of MAGA Republicans say Democrats in Congress would deserve the most blame.
  • The Democratic Party maintains an edge over the Republican Party when it comes to voter trust of handling the future of the ACA, and a narrower edge when it comes to high cost of health insurance. At least one in five voters say they do not trust either party to address these issues. While majorities of Democratic and Republican voters say they trust their own party on these issues, independents are more likely to trust the Democratic Party over the Republican Party on the ACA (38% vs. 18%), though many say they don’t trust either party. Democratic and independent voters are also much more likely than Republican voters to say rising health costs would impact their willingness to vote and their candidate choice. Nearly six in ten Democratic voters and half of independent voters say an annual health cost increase of $1,000 – the average expected increase for marketplace enrollees if the ACA enhanced premium tax credits expire – would have a “major impact” on both their decision to turnout to vote and which candidate they would support, compared to about three in ten Republican voters.  

Majorities of the Public Continue to Support Extending ACA Tax Credits; Most Democrats Want Budget Deal to Include Extension

As part of the ongoing budget negotiations, Democratic leaders are pushing to extend the enhanced premium tax credits, which help some people afford their health insurance through marketplaces created by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). These tax credits are currently set to expire at the end of the year. Republican lawmakers, on the other hand, say they will take up the ACA tax credits after the government is reopened.

Conducted as people began reviewing ACA plan options for this year’s open enrollment, this poll shows that extending these tax credits beyond 2025 continues to be popular among the public. About three quarters (74%) of U.S. adults overall say Congress should extend the enhanced tax credits for people who purchase their own insurance through ACA marketplaces, about three times the share who say Congress should let these credits expire. Three quarters (76%) of adults who purchase their own health insurance, most of whom do so through ACA marketplaces, support the extension of these tax credits, while one in four (23%) say they should expire.

At least half of adults across partisans continue to support the extension of these tax credits. This includes more than nine in ten (94%) Democrats, three quarters (76%) of independents, and half of Republicans. However, Republican support for Congress extending the tax credits has dropped nine percentage points in the past month as the enhanced premium tax credits have become a talking point around the budget negotiations and a major sticking point for Democratic lawmakers. In addition, supporters of the “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) movement are now 13 percentage points less likely to say these tax credits should be extended, from about six in ten (57%) last month, to fewer than half (44%) now.  

A Majority of the Public Says Congress Should Extend ACA Tax Credits, Though Republican and MAGA Support Has Declined from Last Month

Now in its sixth week, the government shutdown has resulted in missed paychecks for some federal employees and delays in full SNAP benefits, adding pressure on Congress to reach an agreement. Overall, the public is split over what they think Congressional Democrats should do, with half (50%) saying they should “approve a budget that does not include extending these tax credits in order to quickly end the shutdown, even if it means the cost of health insurance will increase for some people,” while a similar share (48%) say Congressional Democrats should “refuse to approve a budget unless it includes extending these tax credits, even if it means the government remains shut down.”

A large majority of Democrats (81%) support Congressional Democrats holding out for a deal that includes extending the ACA’s enhanced premium tax credits, even if it prolongs a government shutdown. Independents are split, with about half (51%) saying Democratic leaders should refuse to approve a budget without the tax credit extensions and half (47%) saying they should approve a budget to quickly end the shutdown. More than eight in ten (84%) Republicans say Democratic lawmakers should approve a budget to end the shutdown.

More than half (55%) of those who purchase their own health insurance say Democrats should refuse to approve a budget that does not include an extension for ACA subsidies, while 45% say Democrats should approve the budget without the subsidies to quickly end the shutdown. Notably, past KFF polls have shown that nearly half of adults enrolled in ACA marketplace plans identify as Republican or lean Republican.

Most Democrats, and Half of Independents, Say Congressional Democrats Should Refuse to Approve a Budget Without ACA Tax Credit Extension

If Congress does not pass an extension for the enhanced tax credits, those who want to see the credits extended are most likely to blame Republican leaders, including President Trump. Nearly four in ten of those who support extending the tax credits say that if they are not extended Republicans in Congress deserve the most blame (38%, or 28% of all adults) and a similar share (37%, or 28% of all adults) say President Trump deserves most of the blame. About one in four (23% or 17% of total adults) say Democrats in Congress deserve the most blame. Notably, the group that supports extending the tax credits is made up of larger shares of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents.

Among the half of Republicans who want to see the tax credits extended, seven in ten say they would blame Democrats in Congress if the tax credits are allowed to expire, rising to eight in ten MAGA-supporters.

Most Adults Who Support Extending ACA Tax Credits Blame Republican Lawmakers, Including President Trump, if Tax Credits Expire

Despite the ongoing legislative debate over the government shutdown, awareness of the lapsing enhanced premium tax credits remains limited, even among the group most directly impacted by the loss of tax credits. Overall, more than half of adults say they have heard or read “a little” (28%) or “nothing at all” (29%) about the issue, while 44% have heard or read “a lot” (13%) or “some” (30%). Among those who buy their own insurance, half say they have heard at least “some,” compared to four in ten last month.

Some Republican lawmakers have claimed that Democratic efforts to extend the ACA’s enhanced premium tax credits would allow undocumented immigrants to receive federally subsidized health insurance. This KFF poll gauged the public’s understanding of this claim over who is eligible for ACA coverage. About half (47%) of U.S. adults correctly say that undocumented immigrants are not eligible to buy health coverage on ACA marketplaces. There is some confusion, however, as about one in seven (14%) incorrectly say undocumented immigrants are eligible and nearly four in ten (39%) say they are not sure.

Although this claim has been made by some Republican lawmakers and conservative media outlets, there are no partisan differences in awareness of this aspect of ACA eligibility. At least half of Republicans (57%) and Democrats (52%) say undocumented immigrants are not eligible for this, while at least three in ten across partisans say they are not sure. A larger share of independents (44%) say they are not sure whether undocumented immigrants are eligible to buy coverage on the ACA marketplaces.

About Half of Adults Correctly Say Undocumented Immigrants Are Not Eligible for ACA Coverage, Including Similar Shares of Democrats and Republicans

Health Costs Could Influence Voters in 2026, and Democratic Party Holds Edge on Trust to Address ACA

There is some indication that these budget negotiations could influence how voters think about health care and their decisions at the ballot box in coming years. Consistent with previous polling, the Democratic Party continues to hold an advantage over the Republican Party among voters on which party they trust to do a better job addressing the future of the 2010 Affordable Care Act, or ACA. About four in ten voters (43%) say they trust the Democratic Party to do a better job addressing the future of the ACA compared to one-third (32%) of voters who say they trust the Republican Party. Democrats also have a small advantage on which party voters trust to address the high cost of health insurance (39% v. 33%), though a quarter of voters say they trust neither party on this issue.

On both health care issues, Democratic and Republican voters largely trust their own party. While the Democratic Party has a strong advantage over the Republican Party among independent voters on who they trust to do a better job handling the future of the ACA (38% v. 18%, respectively), independents are more split on which party they trust to address the high cost of health insurance.  More than one-third of independent voters say they do not trust either party to do a better job handling the ACA’s future (36%) or addressing the high cost of health coverage (41%).

The Democratic Party Holds Slight Edge in Trust on ACA and Health Coverage Costs Among Voters, Though Some Don’t Trust Either Party

As leaders in both political parties blame each other for the extended government shutdown, Democratic and Republican campaign groups have started running ads in competitive congressional districts, in hopes that the situation will boost their party’s standing with voters.

Yet, the possibility of increasing health care costs resonates as a stronger motivator for Democratic voters and independent voters, rather than Republican voters. When asked how a $1,000 increase in their health care costs – the average expected increase for marketplace enrollees if the ACA’s enhanced premium tax credits expire – would affect their 2026 vote, nearly six in ten Democratic voters and more than half of independent voters say it would have a “major impact” on both their decision to vote (59% and 54%) and which candidate they support (56% and 52%). About three in ten Republican voters say such an increase would have a “major impact” on either their decision to turn out or who they support. Although the expiring enhanced premium tax credits directly affect only those who purchase their own coverage on the ACA marketplaces, this suggests that rising health care costs resonate more as a voting issue among Democrats and independents than Republicans.

Majority of Voters Say an Increase in Their Health Care Costs Would Influence Their 2026 Vote



Source link

What the Election Results Tell Us about the Economy and Health Care Costs 



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

We had the first glimpse of how the congressional debate in Washington over the federal shutdown and extending the enhanced premium tax credits for people who purchase coverage on the ACA marketplaces may be impacting voters’ decisions in upcoming elections last night. Looking at the 2025 Voter Poll results from Virginia and New Jersey, the economy remains the top issue for voters (48% of voters in Virginia said it was the most important issue facing the state as did 32% of New Jersey voters), health care came in behind economic issues with about one in five voters saying it was their most important issue. And this group of voters went disproportionately for the Democratic candidates. For example, in Virginia, the Democratic candidate for Governor won 81% of voters who said health care was the most important issue facing the state. The only group that the Republican candidate did as well with was the 11% of voters who said immigration was their top issue. In New Jersey, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill won 92% of health care voters. Notably, both Democratic candidates for Governor also won a majority of voters who said the economy was their most important issue – a group that President Trump won handedly back in 2024. After Tuesday’s elections, it is becoming increasingly difficult to disentangle concerns about the economy and concerns about health care as costs become the most pressing health care issue for voters, as CEO Drew Altman and I have both argued in the past.

There are many caveats and cautions before predicting how this off-year election and the current debate and government shutdown will play out a year from now including the fact that these election results are limited to two states and elections are often more about specific candidates than actually about issues. In addition, if there is a deal on the ACA tax credits, it will no longer serve as a talking point for candidates. However, the results do underscore the advantage that Democratic candidates still have on health care issues. And as economic issues and health care concerns become even more intertwined, as seen in the debate over the ACA tax credits in Washington, voters may give the upper hand to Democratic candidates in the voting booth. The 2025 election results highlight the growing importance of addressing health care costs in both policy debates and electoral choices.



Source link

How ACA Marketplace Costs Compare to Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

This analysis compares ACA Marketplace costs to employer-sponsored health insurance costs and finds that individual market premiums have become more similar to employer-sponsored premiums since 2017. In 2024, individual market insurance premiums averaged $540 per member per month, slightly below the average $587 per member per month premium for fully-insured employer coverage.

The analysis uses data from Mark Farrah Associates Health Coverage Portal to compare average premiums in the individual and group insurance markets. The data is based on insurer filings to NAIC in the Annual Exhibit of Premiums and Utilization, showing the average premiums and claims per member per month.

The full analysis and other data on health costs are available on the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, an online information hub dedicated to monitoring and assessing the performance of the U.S. health system.



Source link

Developments in Prescription Drug Pricing under the Second Trump Administration



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

Amid perennial public concern about the cost of prescription drugs, the Trump administration has undertaken a raft of efforts to push or persuade drug manufacturers to lower drug prices. These include “Most Favored Nation” proposals that would tie U.S. drug prices to the lowest cost in other countries and encouraging manufacturers to make more drugs available for sale directly to consumers at discounted prices. To date, the administration has inked two voluntary deals with pharmaceutical companies to sell drugs to the Medicaid program at most-favored nation pricing and launch new drugs in the U.S. at the same price as in other countries in exchange for a three-year reprieve from new tariffs on their products. The administration also is setting up a website, Trumprx.gov, scheduled to launch in 2026, through which it plans to connect consumers to manufacturers and other vendors enabling direct-purchase of prescription drugs.

On November 20 at 12 p.m. ET, three experts join Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF, for a 45-minute “Health Wonk Shop” discussion about the latest developments in prescription drug pricing and what they mean for drug manufacturers, patients and public and private health insurance programs.  Among the questions to be discussed include:

  • How do the administration’s efforts to lower drug prices square with drug price negotiation in Medicare, and a provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that allows drug companies to exempt more products from those negotiations?
  • Are the Trump administration’s moves translating into lower drug prices for consumers? Which consumers might benefit most from these efforts? Are those prices at least as low as those paid for the same drugs in comparable countries?
  • How will the availability of drugs be affected, if at all?
  • What might the effects be on drug prices in other countries?
  • How effective will voluntary agreements with drug companies be over time?

Moderator

Photo of Larry Levitt

Larry Levitt

Executive Vice President for Health Policy

Panelists

Juliette Cubanski, PhD

Deputy Director, Program on Medicare Policy

Stacie Dusetzina, PhD

Professor of Health Policy and Ingram Professor of Cancer Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Darius Lakdawalla, PhD

Chief Scientific Officer, USC’s Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, and Quintiles Chair of Pharmaceutical Development and Regulatory Innovation at the USC Mann School



Source link

How much do dental cleanings cost without insurance?



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

How much is a dental cleaning cost without insurance?

Without dental insurance, the average price of a dental cleaning is likely to be between $75 and $200.

Do I need insurance to get my teeth cleaned?

No. You can get your teeth cleaned without having dental insurance. You can simply pay out-of-pocket for the cleaning. But having dental insurance can be helpful in a couple of ways.

First, many dental insurance policies cover all or most of the cost of routine cleanings, as long as you use an in-network dentist. Depending on your policy, you might not have any out-of-pocket costs for a routine cleaning, and it might also cover all or most of the cost of X-rays and a dental exam, if needed.

Second, having dental insurance might make you more likely to stay on top of getting your routine cleanings, which can protect your dental health in the long run. People with dental insurance are much more likely to receive preventive dental care than those who don’t have dental coverage. This is also true of all necessary dental care, which is more likely to be skipped due to cost when the patient doesn’t have dental insurance.

What factors can impact the cost of a dental cleaning?

Several factors can impact the cost of a dental cleaning, including:

The specific dental office you use.

  • Dentists set their own prices, so they may charge more or less than average.

Whether a comprehensive exam and X-rays are needed.

  • If it’s been a while since your last dental visit, the dentist may want to do a comprehensive exam in addition to the cleaning, and that can cost between $70 and $200, depending on the dentist.
  • Dental X-rays may only be needed once every two or three years, depending on the patient. The cost of X-rays depends on the type of imaging that’s needed; a full-mouth series will likely cost between $175 and $428.

Whether you need a deep cleaning (tooth scaling and root planing) to address gum disease.

  • Deep cleanings are more involved – and are thus more expensive – than a basic dental cleaning. The cost of a deep dental cleaning can cost up to $350 if you don’t need anesthesia, although anesthesia can significantly increase the price

Whether you get a fluoride treatment.

  • Depending on the circumstances, your dentist might recommend a fluoride treatment after your cleaning is complete. A fluoride treatment will likely add about $30 to the cost of your cleaning.

How can I save money on dental cleanings?

If you don’t have dental insurance, there are several ways you can save money on dental cleanings. They include:


Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written hundreds of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org.





Source link

How Much More Would People Pay in Premiums if the ACA’s Enhanced Premium Tax Credits Expire?| KFF



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

The FAQs below are intended to help you understand this Calculator. More detailed questions and answers about signing up for coverage are available on our Marketplace FAQ page.

I am having difficulty viewing or understanding my results. What should I do?

It could be that you are using an older version of Microsoft Edge or Firefox. Try updating to a newer version of your web browser. Not sure which browser version you are running? Check here for Microsoft Edge or here for Firefox. If you continue to have technical problems with the Calculator after updating your browser, please contact KFF.

Please note that we are not able to provide individual advice or assistance understanding your results.

Does the calculator provide definitive results for what I will pay?

No. The comparison calculator is based on 2025 premiums for plans sold in your area, as 2026 premiums are not available yet. There are several additional reasons why your calculator results may differ from your actual tax credit amount or premium payment. For example, the calculator relies completely on information as you enter it, whereas the Marketplace may calculate your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) to be a different amount or may verify your income against previous year’s data. Additionally, some plans may include non-essential benefits, which would not be subsidized by premium tax credits. To find out if you are eligible for financial assistance under current law and to sign up, you must contact HealthCare.gov, your state’s Health Insurance Marketplace, or Medicaid program office. Results in both columns are illustrative. Values under the enhanced premium tax credits scenario use the 2025 federal poverty guidelines as the basis for tax credit calculations whereas in plan year 2025, the Exchanges used 2024 federal poverty guidelines to calculate the required contribution toward benchmark plan coverage.

How do health insurance premium tax credits work?

Premium tax credits are financial assistance from the Federal government to help you pay for health coverage or care. The amount of assistance you get is determined by your income and family size. For more information of how health insurance premium tax credits are calculated, visit this page.

What is included in household income? How do I know what to enter for my income?

For information on how to calculate your household income, see here.

What is Medicaid? How does it relate to financial help through the Health Insurance Marketplace?

Medicaid is a comprehensive, free health insurance program  for people with limited income.  This interactive takes into account whether your state has expanded Medicaid or not and will give you an estimate of whether your household income qualifies you and your family for Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), if applicable. Members of your family that are eligible for either Medicaid or CHIP are not eligible for premium tax credits in the Marketplace and would instead need to sign up for Medicaid or CHIP.

If I am eligible for Medicare, can I still sign up on the Marketplace?

No, you cannot sign up for new Marketplace coverage if you are eligible for Medicare.  Most people age 65 and older are eligible for Medicare, which is the health insurance program run by the federal government.  If you are eligible for Medicare, even if you do not choose to enroll in Medicare, you are not able to purchase Marketplace coverage.

When using the Health Insurance Marketplace Calculator, if some members of your household are eligible for Medicare and others are not, you should enter your full household size (including those who are eligible for Medicare) in Question #4. For the following question, please enter only those family members who are signing up for Marketplace coverage (do not enter adults who are eligible for Medicare in Question #5).

If you are over the age of 65 but not yet eligible for Medicare due to immigration status or your work history, you may be eligible for Marketplace coverage and premium tax credits. You can use the Health Insurance Marketplace Calculator by entering your age as 64.

What are my options if I have job-based health coverage?

In general, people who qualify for health insurance through their job are not able to get financial assistance through the Marketplaces.

However, if your employer’s coverage is either unaffordable or doesn’t meet the health care law’s “minimum value” requirement, then you may be eligible for financial help to purchase through the Marketplace. Family members (spouses and children) who are eligible for employer-sponsored coverage can still qualify for Marketplace premium tax credits if the employer-sponsored coverage for the family is considered unaffordable, even if the employee has access to affordable individual coverage. Starting in 2023, the so-called “family glitch” has been fixed to allow family members in these circumstances to enroll in subsidized coverage.

When using the Health Insurance Marketplace Calculator, you can answer “No” to Question #3 if your employer’s coverage is unaffordable or does not meet the minimum value requirement.



Source link

ACA Insurers Are Raising Premiums by an Estimated 26%, but Most Enrollees Could See Sharper Increases in What They Pay



rewrite this content and keep HTML tags

The amount health insurers charge for coverage on the ACA Marketplaces is rising 26%, on average, in 2026. In states that run their own Marketplaces, the average benchmark (second-lowest cost) silver premium, on which the tax credit calculation is based, is rising 17% next year. In states that use Healthcare.gov, these premiums are rising an average of 30%.

Most enrollees would face even sharper increases in what they pay if they ACA’s enhanced premium tax credits expire. This 26% is the increase in the amount insurers are charging, which in most cases is not what enrollees pay. 22 million out of 24 million marketplace enrollees currently receive a tax credit. The amount subsidized enrollees pay is not what insurers charge, but rather a sliding-scale share of their household income, based on a formula set by Congress. If Congress extends the enhanced tax credits, the amount subsidized enrollees pay each month will remain about the same, even though the amount insurers are charging is increasing sharply.

If the enhanced premium tax credits expire at the end of this year, KFF estimates that currently subsidized enrollees will see their monthly premium payments more than double, increasing by about 114%, on average. This reflects people with incomes below four times the poverty level receiving less financial assistance and those with incomes over four times poverty no longer being eligible for financial assistance at all and therefore being hit by a double whammy of lost tax credit and higher insurer premiums.

ACA Insurers Are Raising Premiums by an Estimated 26%, but Most Enrollees Would See Sharper Increases in What They Pay if Enhanced Tax Credits Expire

Even if the enhanced tax credits expire, many lower income enrollees will continue to be eligible for a bronze plan with zero or a very low premium payment after accounting for the smaller tax credit they will continue to receive. However, this could mean switching from a silver plan with a reduced deductible as low as under $100 to a bronze plan with a deductible of over $7,000.

The amount insurers charge for ACA Marketplace premiums is rising for several reasons, including but not limited to increasing hospital costs, the rising popularity of expensive GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic, and the threat of tariffs. These factors are similarly cited by insurers selling employer coverage. However, an additional factor driving up the amount insurers charge for ACA Marketplace premiums (that is not affecting employer premiums) is the expected expiration of the enhanced premium tax credit. In their 2026 filings to state regulators describing their requested premium increases, ACA Marketplace insurers said they would charge about 4 percentage points more, on average, than they otherwise would have because they expected healthier people to drop Marketplace coverage if enhanced premiums tax credit expire.

Because the ACA’s tax credit is tied to the cost of the second-lowest cost silver plan, when these benchmark premiums rise, so does the federal cost of offering tax credits.



Source link